Shaping Thought: Daily Star - "Astronauts 'REFUSE to confirm Moon landing was real in shocking footage'"

Just a very quick one here that concerns this article in bottom-of-the-barrel entertainment rag, The Daily Star (although, to be fair, when it comes to Boris Johnson and cronies, they have been the most iconoclastic and irreverant of all the "news" papers, so respect for that).

 Here's the piece: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/weird-news/moon-landing-faked-claim-astronauts-18677434

The first problem we have here is that is that when I first created this article as a draft on 21st May 2021, the video in the Daily Star piece actually loaded. Now it does not. I've noticed also that the Bill Gates video on the Greta Thunberg article has been deleted in the last six months. It appears that the "burning of the books" has begun in earnest. Here's a better version though, showing him asking multiple astronauts: 

Anyway, the video shows a man going up to people who claim to have been on the moon, and then asking them to swear on a Bible that they have been on the moon.

All the astronauts refuse and get agitated or angry.

This would indicate that these people have never been to the moon, and would also explain why Buzz Aldrin once punched the man asking the questions here... he panicked and wanted to get the subject changed ASAP. Also why Neil Armstrong is such a recluse.

Now, people do tend to believe who got there first and I have read the book Moon Dust which is full of accounts of people who claim to have been on the moon but there is some great research out there that proves a lot of stuff is faked. However, this stuff tends to be hard to find as it gets taken down. I really should start backing things up and hosting them myself.

Anyway, the point of the article is this: there is nothing strange about what is going on here, somebody asks somebody to do something to prove they are telling the truth, and they refuse.

The problem here is the language the Daily Star uses to subconsciously associate the truth with insanity...

First of all, the headline reads:

Astronauts 'REFUSE to confirm Moon landing was real in shocking footage'

But why the quotes? It really should read:

Astronauts REFUSE to confirm Moon landing was real in shocking footage

The quotes are intended to discredit, even though the statement is factually correct.

Then, the interviewer is dismissed as a "conspiracy theorist" and the footage is dubbed "bizarre", no question why it's put in the "weird news" category despite the fact that there isn't really anything crazy going on from an objective view, they just need to shoehorn as many words in that act as anchor words to make people think a certain thing. In this case, that what the interviewer is proposing is insane, overruling the actual reality of the video: the astronauts act like people with something to hide, running away, hitting, being abusive. Nobody is calm. It's all dressed up by the Star to make it seem like these heroes are beneath this little boy's nonsense: check out how the astronauts are referred to: "the legendary astronaut, the first man to walk on the moon" and "He was later punched in the face by hero Buzz Aldrin". Another astronaut said “I’m going to give you the opportunity to get knocked out if you don’t leave me alone.” Definitely the words of a man with nothing to hide, why not swear on the Bible and be done with it?

Also, as well as using the term "conspiracy theorist", a term created by the CIA in order to discredit those who believed there to be something fishy about JFK's assassination, the term "truther" is used, again in order to discredit that term, which is a lot better term than the other, hence the need to do so. If the reader ever meets somebody who says "I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm a truther", then the reader will think the person is crazy and not pay attention to them, due to this subconscious programming.

Anyway, that's it. Not the best written and needs more pictures, but I'll come back to it as and when, just bashing some things out on a lazy day.

Greta Thunberg: Illuminati Stooge, and her role in solving "climate change" (ie. the depopulation agenda)

This is a slightly edited version of something I wrote on Facebook in 2019 shortly after Greta Thunberg first appeared. It was a response to people who claimed there was no agenda she was pushing other than being concerned with climate change. So, I took the time to give a quick response and was met with... nothing. Business as usual!

 The question: Why is Greta Thunberg pushing an agenda?

The first assumption that we need to make is that the people who run the world (generally known as an occult "elite") are working against our best interests. Proving or disproving this is outside the scope of this discussion, especially considering how hard it is on both sides to get the other to see the other's viewpoint. So, to anybody who refuses to accept this assumption, this completely discredits and invalidates pretty much anything that I say from here on in. From my point of view, I would say that people tend to believe whoever got there first. After that, people can tend to be inflexible. I try to illustrate why that is in my Shaping Thought articles, but reality is that the people who really need to be reading such articles would dismiss them as crazy before even clicking a link to this blog, let alone getting this far.

The second assumption that one needs to make is that there is a depopulation agenda. To be brief, here are links to support this fact:

First of all, the first "commandment" of the Georgia Guidestones is that the Earth's population must be maintained at 500 million. Here is a link to the Wikipedia article on it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

This website comes at it from more of a conspiracy theory angle: https://vigilantcitizen.com/sinistersites/sinister-sites-the-georgia-guidestones/

This is a video that shows Bill Gates lecturing at a TED talk in 2010 about using vaccines to reduce the amount of CO2 produced by humans.

(Update 25/6/2022: was a YT link but, as the lamestream media burns the books in earnest, I've noticed now the account was deleted. I'm thankful Bitchute has another copy. It used to be embedded but now you've got to click on the link)

A friend of mine recently showed me Snopes' refutation to this: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-gates-vaccinations-depopulation/

To me personally, this has always been the page that proved that Snopes isn't about exposing the truth, but pushing an agenda... because if you watch the clip, the whole vibe is Bill Gates saying "there is too much CO2, therefore reduce the population". The rest of the Snopes article, to me, is damage limitation and backtracking - the site's job is done if it can encourage the reader to not actually watch the video, where the true intention of Bill Gates is so obviously clear.

A quick Google search will yield a number of articles about vaccines in Africa containing drugs that make women sterile. Some will support the argument, some will claim to refute it. If such a thing is a falsehood, why does such a claim exist in the first place? Here's a link to an article claiming the tetanus vaccine make 500,000 Kenyan women women sterile: https://allafrica.com/stories/201502150078.html

As far back as 1995, vaccine manufacturers have been accused of such: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12346214/ 

 
I also remember reading years ago that at the Copenhagen Summit, they were actually talking about reducing the population. This would've been about 10 years ago now, even if I could find a bookmarked article it's probably long since deleted.

So, how does this tie in to Greta Thunberg? Okay, taking all the above factors into account, a third assumption can be made: the people running the world are acting against our best interests; there is a depopulation agenda, and the climate change issue is covertly being used to promote this agenda.

I shall end with a couple of links to the website Vigilant Citizen, which I would recommend as a pretty solid resource for this sort of thing, which focuses on facts that can be verified, rather than abstract metaphysical concepts that can't be proved or disproved. I must admit that at first all the references to symbolism appears to be reaching, but once you see it again and again and again, a very solid case is presented.

This is a link to a man promoting an obsession of the occult "elite", cannibalism, and touting it as a solution to climate change!: https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/scientist-proposes-cannibalism-to-save-the-climate-on-swedish-tv/

If they could promote paedophilia/incest as a solution to climate change, they'd do it. I guess this will do for them for now... (honestly... it probably will get to "have sex with your immediate family to reduce the population" - you heard it here first)

Anyway, Greta Thunberg... well, the one eye sign is usually used as a symbol of submission to the occult "elite", so here's two pics of Greta doing it, from May 2019:

 

On the cover of I-D

 

And another one eye in the photoshoot inside.

 

And she's still at it in 2021, on the cover of a magazine that comes with middle-brow propaganda rag, The Guardian:

 

 

Greta in Vigilant Citizen's "The Elite Machine Behind Greta Thunberg": https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/the-elite-machine-behind-greta-thunberg/

At first you may think nothing of it, but if you explore Vigilant Citizen further, the picture becomes a lot clearer (there are other good resources for this sort of thing, too). I wouldn't expect the "reduce the population" agenda to be made mainsteam for at least a few years yet, though... these things take a lot of time, this is the culmination of a plan that has taken thousands of years.

The Overton Window is a technique used to make the previously unthinkable, thinkable. The example given in this article shows the normalisation of cannibalism, and this has been going on for years. For example, there was what people assumed was some sort of LARP in 2020 (https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message4235821/pg1), a website called peoplearemeat.com appeared, claiming to be a cannibal restaurant. Here's a Wayback Machine link: https://web.archive.org/web/20200111204848/https://peoplearemeat.com/

Don't be surprised as this slowly enters the public arena, outside of the true news that people are conditioned to dismiss as fake news, when the real fake news is the mainstream news. Here's a link to an explanation of the Overton Window: https://www.otilo.net/2021/05/the-overton-window-theory-technology-of.html

Edit 24/7/2022: The New York Times recently published as article about cannibalism, here's the tweet about it: https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1550864590560546816

And here's the article: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/23/style/cannibalism-tv-shows-movies-books.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytimes

Note also the two eyeballs on the picture...😒

Shaping Thought: Salvador Dali and his dream sequence in Alfred Hitchcock's Spellbound (1945)

The dream sequence in Alfred Hitchcock's Spellbound (1945) is the reason given as to why eyes kept cropping up in the background when Porky Pig revisits Wackyland in the colourised remake, which I talk about here.

This article here shows the official story about how Hitchcock ended up working with Dali, but since the eyes in the dream sequence in Spellbound once again serve to anchor the idea that "eyes = crazy" in the subconscious of the viewer, and the motif was "borrowed" in Dough for the Do-Do, which evolved in Babs in Wackyland, I figured that it was eyes for a reason. Could Dali have ties to the Illuminati? The answer is yes.

It turns out that Dali was not only a guest at the Rothschild's Ball in 1972, he designed the costumes... the symbolism suggests multiple personalities and mind control.

Here's another take on the ball, from the VC web site. I am also curious as to why we only see pictures from this particular ball, I'd assume it wasn't just a one off. Just like how it's recently been leaked that Matt Hancock has had an affair and has resigned, a convenient fall guy to keep the people sweet as he acts out his part, I'm sure the general public only get to see what they want us to see.

Anyway, here's the Salvador Dali Dream Sequence from Spellbound (1945):

Here's four pictures from right at the start:

Yes, a man even cuts through a huge eye to reveal... another huge eye! They do a good job of setting the scene and, more to the point, to make people associate any talk of one eye with somebody being crazy, as the man continues to describe the subsequent bizarre events that unfold on the screen.

Shaping Thought: Looney Tunes and the evolution of Wackyland: Porky in Wackyland (1938), Dough for the Do-Do (1949), Tiny Toon Adventures (1990)

I was watching a Looney Tunes video with my daughter a number of years ago and there was a cartoon called "Dough for the Do-Do" which was a remake of 1938 cartoon "Porky in Wackyland". I'll give a full analysis of it but I will give a very brief synopsis here... Porky Pig hunts a dodo, who/which is crazy, which is set out from the start when the dodo moors its boat and throws the anchor out, destroying it. In the 1949 colour remake, there were a lot of eyes in the background. The brilliant thing is, Wikipedia's article outlines all the differences between the first and second version, but somehow sidesteps the fact that there's a load of eyes in it, that weren't there before. It dresses itself up as being inspired by the pictures of Dali, especially The Persistence of Memory, but Dali's pictures were never full of eyes - however, Dali collaborated with Alfred Hitchcock to design the dream sequence in the film Spellbound (1945), which is full of eyes (this dream sequence also serves the same purpose - to associate the illuminati/satan's symbolism with the crazy and bizarre, as well as to leave their stamp on their productions - I talk about it here). This is an example of the Overton Window in action, where the media is used to promote an idea in a way that the majority aren't even aware happens.

In fact, when I go over to watch films and TV shows from my youth, I notice a lot of symbolism now that I didn't before, and agendas being pushed. So this is just basic subliminal programming designed to make people shut down completely and think people are crazy when they start to talk to them about basic things like the eye in the pyramid, which is the symbol of lucifer the so-called "light bringer", AKA the devil, the current ruler of this world that the Illuminati love so much. Although his illumination is false compared to the true light of Christ (and I know that when we ascend to the next level of consciousness and return to the way things were before the fall of man, this will become apparent very quickly! Something I also need to get around to writing about eventually): 

The eye in the pyramid hidden in plain sight on the dollar bill, just to show the "classic" design:

It may say "IN GOD WE TRUST" but their God sure isn't mine.

And on the Illuminati's official website (please don't believe the lies if you click)... note how they made the A a little pyramid, too...:

And why not the classic Eye of Horus in the pyramid? Here it is from the website of a chapter of occult organisation, the A.A.:

Iron Maiden are a band who've embraced Egyptian symbolism, as it is satanic symbolism. A shill on the VC forums once told me that Egypt couldn't have been satanic because it was pantheistic, not monotheistic, but I just see it as Amen-Ra: the devil, all the other gods: demons. Anyway, no surprise to see such a symbol on the bass player's shirt:

And on the drummer's kit:

Anyway, the whole point of this article was to talk about the symbolism in Wackyland. So, the idea is to get people to first associate Wackyland and Gogo Dodo with the crazy, bizarre and absurd. Ten years later, incorporate a load of eyes into the mix, so people associate eyes with the crazy, bizarre and absurd. Finally, years later, update Wackyland to include the eye in the pyramid... you get the point.

Anyway, the reason why these Porky Pig/Gogo Dodo cartoons resonated with me was because I used to watch Tiny Toon Adventures when I was about 11 years old, and I always liked the character of Gogo Dodo. The title song says "And Gogo is insane!" just as he hits himself over the head with a mallet in the title sequence... but as Gogo Dodo moves around his landscape, you can see the first few frames disappear into the right hand side... there's an eye in a pyramid disappearing off the side... blink and you'll miss it but it's there.... subliminal programming built up over longer than most of us have lived... what's stopping them distorting the natural order of things through some media or other for millenia?

Anyway, this video is a side-by-side comparison of Dough for the Do-Do and Porky in Wackyland:

Here's some screenshots that I took. First of all, the title card incorporates an eye, so the symbolism is there right from the start (you tend to get the shot of one eye in the first scene in a lot of films, too... to just name a few off the top of my head: A Better Tomorrow, Goodfellas, Nobody (2021) - usually violent/horror films):

The fact that the first thing Gogo Dodo does is sink his boat firmly plants the idea that Gogo Dodo = crazy:

Part of a background that loops when Gogo Dodo is running away from Porky Pig:

So, as we've seen, we've got the idea that "Wackyland and Gogo Dodo = crazy" embedded into people's minds from 1938 onwards, then it adds eyes 11 years later, so the connection is there so people think "people talking about one eye = crazy, because one eye = crazy". As shown above, the eye in the pyramid was added into the Wackyland mix in Tiny Toon Adventures (1990). Here's some stills from a short called Babs Goes to Wackyland:

She hides one eye before the big reveal of Gogo Dodo:

And there's an eye in the pyramid in the background now:

And there's another Tiny Toons Adventure episode called Her Wacky Highness, in which Babs ventures to Wackyland again. There's other noteworthy stuff in this but I'll concentrate on Wackyland. Here are some stills...

A man entices you to Wackyland, note the eyes in the background, albeit pairs...

The announcer is revealed to actually be Gogo Dodo:

As Babs descends into Wackyland, there's an eye in the pyramid in the first shot:

And also when a gigantic mouth is screaming at her. To associate people talking about the truth with pure insanity, maybe? Yeah, I'd say so:

Here is a link to analysis of Metropolis (1927), the above research is my own but here are the major themes which are still pushed these days, in their more embryonic stages cinema-wise, even before these cartoons!

Runway layout at Heathrow Airport

Just a very brief one on the runway layouts of Heathrow Airport, as I just wrote all this, published it, and the whole lot got deleted.

After WW2, the Zionist Jews who run everything decided to put their mark on the UK, a country that was now firmly it's bitch. This is an edited version of the history of Heathrow up until that point, courtesy of Wikipedia:

Heathrow Airport originated in 1929 as a small airfield (Great West Aerodrome) on land south-east of the hamlet of Heathrow from which the airport takes its name... Development of the whole Heathrow area as a much larger airport began in 1944... The airport was opened on 25 March 1946 as London Airport and was renamed Heathrow Airport in 1966.

 Something notable about Heathrow Airport after the war was it's layout. Here's an aerial view from the 1950's:

 

It resembles a hexagram, a six pointed star. More to the point, the two lines that converge near the top, despite missing the final parts, converge to where an eye appears to be... a similar design to the six pointed star that can be extrapolated from the pyramid on the dollar bill, and how it spells "mason": 

 

This is quite interesting since the hexagram is the symbol that perfectly encodes the number 666 in order to hide it in plain sight - six points, six lines, six angles.

This is a satellite view of how Heathrow Airport looks like today. I've drawn a few lines in MSPaint to show what lies in the apex now...

 I'll zoom in on the area right at the top of the pyramid, where the eye was on the original picture:

 As well as a road/track layout that suggests an inverted pentagram, there's a concorde that lies within the "eye". Triumph of man over God, perhaps?

Bonus pic showing the pentagram: