Just a very quick one here that concerns this article in bottom-of-the-barrel entertainment rag, The Daily Star (although, to be fair, when it comes to Boris Johnson and cronies, they have been the most iconoclastic and irreverant of all the "news" papers, so respect for that).
Here's the piece: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/weird-news/moon-landing-faked-claim-astronauts-18677434
The first problem we have here is that is that when I first created this article as a draft on 21st May 2021, the video in the Daily Star piece actually loaded. Now it does not. I've noticed also that the Bill Gates video on the Greta Thunberg article has been deleted in the last six months. It appears that the "burning of the books" has begun in earnest. Here's a better version though, showing him asking multiple astronauts:
All the astronauts refuse and get agitated or angry.
This would indicate that these people have never been to the moon, and would also explain why Buzz Aldrin once punched the man asking the questions here... he panicked and wanted to get the subject changed ASAP. Also why Neil Armstrong is such a recluse.
Now, people do tend to believe who got there first and I have read the book Moon Dust which is full of accounts of people who claim to have been on the moon but there is some great research out there that proves a lot of stuff is faked. However, this stuff tends to be hard to find as it gets taken down. I really should start backing things up and hosting them myself.
Anyway, the point of the article is this: there is nothing strange about what is going on here, somebody asks somebody to do something to prove they are telling the truth, and they refuse.
The problem here is the language the Daily Star uses to subconsciously associate the truth with insanity...
First of all, the headline reads:
Astronauts 'REFUSE to confirm Moon landing was real in shocking footage'
But why the quotes? It really should read:
Astronauts REFUSE to confirm Moon landing was real in shocking footage
The quotes are intended to discredit, even though the statement is factually correct.
Then, the interviewer is dismissed as a "conspiracy theorist" and the footage is dubbed "bizarre", no question why it's put in the "weird news" category despite the fact that there isn't really anything crazy going on from an objective view, they just need to shoehorn as many words in that act as anchor words to make people think a certain thing. In this case, that what the interviewer is proposing is insane, overruling the actual reality of the video: the astronauts act like people with something to hide, running away, hitting, being abusive. Nobody is calm. It's all dressed up by the Star to make it seem like these heroes are beneath this little boy's nonsense: check out how the astronauts are referred to: "the legendary astronaut, the first man to walk on the moon" and "He was later punched in the face by hero Buzz Aldrin". Another astronaut said “I’m going to give you the opportunity to get knocked out if you don’t leave me alone.” Definitely the words of a man with nothing to hide, why not swear on the Bible and be done with it?
Also, as well as using the term "conspiracy theorist", a term created by the CIA in order to discredit those who believed there to be something fishy about JFK's assassination, the term "truther" is used, again in order to discredit that term, which is a lot better term than the other, hence the need to do so. If the reader ever meets somebody who says "I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm a truther", then the reader will think the person is crazy and not pay attention to them, due to this subconscious programming.
Anyway, that's it. Not the best written and needs more pictures, but I'll come back to it as and when, just bashing some things out on a lazy day.
No comments:
Post a Comment