Greta Thunberg: Illuminati Stooge, and her role in solving "climate change" (ie. the depopulation agenda)

This is a slightly edited version of something I wrote on Facebook in 2019 shortly after Greta Thunberg first appeared. It was a response to people who claimed there was no agenda she was pushing other than being concerned with climate change. So, I took the time to give a quick response and was met with... nothing. Business as usual!

 The question: Why is Greta Thunberg pushing an agenda?

The first assumption that we need to make is that the people who run the world (generally known as an occult "elite") are working against our best interests. Proving or disproving this is outside the scope of this discussion, especially considering how hard it is on both sides to get the other to see the other's viewpoint. So, to anybody who refuses to accept this assumption, this completely discredits and invalidates pretty much anything that I say from here on in. From my point of view, I would say that people tend to believe whoever got there first. After that, people can tend to be inflexible. I try to illustrate why that is in my Shaping Thought articles, but reality is that the people who really need to be reading such articles would dismiss them as crazy before even clicking a link to this blog, let alone getting this far.

The second assumption that one needs to make is that there is a depopulation agenda. To be brief, here are links to support this fact:

First of all, the first "commandment" of the Georgia Guidestones is that the Earth's population must be maintained at 500 million. Here is a link to the Wikipedia article on it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

This website comes at it from more of a conspiracy theory angle: https://vigilantcitizen.com/sinistersites/sinister-sites-the-georgia-guidestones/

This is a video that shows Bill Gates lecturing at a TED talk in 2010 about using vaccines to reduce the amount of CO2 produced by humans.

(Update 25/6/2022: was a YT link but, as the lamestream media burns the books in earnest, I've noticed now the account was deleted. I'm thankful Bitchute has another copy. It used to be embedded but now you've got to click on the link)

A friend of mine recently showed me Snopes' refutation to this: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-gates-vaccinations-depopulation/

To me personally, this has always been the page that proved that Snopes isn't about exposing the truth, but pushing an agenda... because if you watch the clip, the whole vibe is Bill Gates saying "there is too much CO2, therefore reduce the population". The rest of the Snopes article, to me, is damage limitation and backtracking - the site's job is done if it can encourage the reader to not actually watch the video, where the true intention of Bill Gates is so obviously clear.

A quick Google search will yield a number of articles about vaccines in Africa containing drugs that make women sterile. Some will support the argument, some will claim to refute it. If such a thing is a falsehood, why does such a claim exist in the first place? Here's a link to an article claiming the tetanus vaccine make 500,000 Kenyan women women sterile: https://allafrica.com/stories/201502150078.html

As far back as 1995, vaccine manufacturers have been accused of such: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12346214/ 

 
I also remember reading years ago that at the Copenhagen Summit, they were actually talking about reducing the population. This would've been about 10 years ago now, even if I could find a bookmarked article it's probably long since deleted.

So, how does this tie in to Greta Thunberg? Okay, taking all the above factors into account, a third assumption can be made: the people running the world are acting against our best interests; there is a depopulation agenda, and the climate change issue is covertly being used to promote this agenda.

I shall end with a couple of links to the website Vigilant Citizen, which I would recommend as a pretty solid resource for this sort of thing, which focuses on facts that can be verified, rather than abstract metaphysical concepts that can't be proved or disproved. I must admit that at first all the references to symbolism appears to be reaching, but once you see it again and again and again, a very solid case is presented.

This is a link to a man promoting an obsession of the occult "elite", cannibalism, and touting it as a solution to climate change!: https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/scientist-proposes-cannibalism-to-save-the-climate-on-swedish-tv/

If they could promote paedophilia/incest as a solution to climate change, they'd do it. I guess this will do for them for now... (honestly... it probably will get to "have sex with your immediate family to reduce the population" - you heard it here first)

Anyway, Greta Thunberg... well, the one eye sign is usually used as a symbol of submission to the occult "elite", so here's two pics of Greta doing it, from May 2019:

 

On the cover of I-D
 
And another one eye in the photoshoot inside.
 

And she's still at it in 2021, on the cover of a magazine that comes with middle-brow propaganda rag, The Guardian:

 


 

Greta in Vigilant Citizen's "The Elite Machine Behind Greta Thunberg": https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/the-elite-machine-behind-greta-thunberg/

At first you may think nothing of it, but if you explore Vigilant Citizen further, the picture becomes a lot clearer (there are other good resources for this sort of thing, too). I wouldn't expect the "reduce the population" agenda to be made mainsteam for at least a few years yet, though... these things take a lot of time, this is the culmination of a plan that has taken thousands of years.

The Overton Window is a technique used to make the previously unthinkable, thinkable. The example given in this article shows the normalisation of cannibalism, and this has been going on for years. For example, there was what people assumed was some sort of LARP in 2020 (https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message4235821/pg1), a website called peoplearemeat.com appeared, claiming to be a cannibal restaurant. Here's a Wayback Machine link: https://web.archive.org/web/20200111204848/https://peoplearemeat.com/

Don't be surprised as this slowly enters the public arena, outside of the true news that people are conditioned to dismiss as fake news, when the real fake news is the mainstream news. Here's a link to an explanation of the Overton Window: https://www.otilo.net/2021/05/the-overton-window-theory-technology-of.html

Edit 24/7/2022: The New York Times recently published as article about cannibalism, here's the tweet about it: https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1550864590560546816





Note also the two eyeballs on the picture...😒














Shaping Thought: Salvador Dali and his dream sequence in Alfred Hitchcock's Spellbound (1945)

The dream sequence in Alfred Hitchcock's Spellbound (1945) is the reason given as to why eyes kept cropping up in the background when Porky Pig revisits Wackyland in the colourised remake, which I talk about here.

This article here shows the official story about how Hitchcock ended up working with Dali, but since the eyes in the dream sequence in Spellbound once again serve to anchor the idea that "eyes = crazy" in the subconscious of the viewer, and the motif was "borrowed" in Dough for the Do-Do, which evolved in Babs in Wackyland, I figured that it was eyes for a reason. Could Dali have ties to the Illuminati? The answer is yes.

It turns out that Dali was not only a guest at the Rothschild's Ball in 1972, he designed the costumes... the symbolism suggests multiple personalities and mind control.


Here's another take on the ball, from the VC web site. I am also curious as to why we only see pictures from this particular ball, I'd assume it wasn't just a one off. Just like how it's recently been leaked that Matt Hancock has had an affair and has resigned, a convenient fall guy to keep the people sweet as he acts out his part, I'm sure the general public only get to see what they want us to see.

Anyway, here's the Salvador Dali Dream Sequence from Spellbound (1945):



Here's four pictures from right at the start:





Yes, a man even cuts through a huge eye to reveal... another huge eye! They do a good job of setting the scene and, more to the point, to make people associate any talk of one eye with somebody being crazy, as the man continues to describe the subsequent bizarre events that unfold on the screen.

Shaping Thought: Looney Tunes and the evolution of Wackyland: Porky in Wackyland (1938), Dough for the Do-Do (1949), Tiny Toon Adventures (1990)

I was watching a Looney Tunes video with my daughter a number of years ago and there was a cartoon called "Dough for the Do-Do" which was a remake of 1938 cartoon "Porky in Wackyland". I'll give a full analysis of it but I will give a very brief synopsis here... Porky Pig hunts a dodo, who/which is crazy, which is set out from the start when the dodo moors its boat and throws the anchor out, destroying it. In the 1949 colour remake, there were a lot of eyes in the background. The brilliant thing is, Wikipedia's article outlines all the differences between the first and second version, but somehow sidesteps the fact that there's a load of eyes in it, that weren't there before. It dresses itself up as being inspired by the pictures of Dali, especially The Persistence of Memory, but Dali's pictures were never full of eyes - however, Dali collaborated with Alfred Hitchcock to design the dream sequence in the film Spellbound (1945), which is full of eyes (this dream sequence also serves the same purpose - to associate the illuminati/satan's symbolism with the crazy and bizarre, as well as to leave their stamp on their productions - I talk about it here). This is an example of the Overton Window in action, where the media is used to promote an idea in a way that the majority aren't even aware happens.

In fact, when I go over to watch films and TV shows from my youth, I notice a lot of symbolism now that I didn't before, and agendas being pushed. So this is just basic subliminal programming designed to make people shut down completely and think people are crazy when they start to talk to them about basic things like the eye in the pyramid, which is the symbol of lucifer the so-called "light bringer", AKA the devil, the current ruler of this world that the Illuminati love so much. Although his illumination is false compared to the true light of Christ (and I know that when we ascend to the next level of consciousness and return to the way things were before the fall of man, this will become apparent very quickly! Something I also need to get around to writing about eventually): 

The eye in the pyramid hidden in plain sight on the dollar bill, just to show the "classic" design:


It may say "IN GOD WE TRUST" but their God sure isn't mine.

And on the Illuminati's official website (please don't believe the lies if you click)... note how they made the A a little pyramid, too...:

And why not the classic Eye of Horus in the pyramid? Here it is from the website of a chapter of occult organisation, the A.A.:


Iron Maiden are a band who've embraced Egyptian symbolism, as it is satanic symbolism. A shill on the VC forums once told me that Egypt couldn't have been satanic because it was pantheistic, not monotheistic, but I just see it as Amen-Ra: the devil, all the other gods: demons. Anyway, no surprise to see such a symbol on the bass player's shirt:

And on the drummer's kit:

Anyway, the whole point of this article was to talk about the symbolism in Wackyland. So, the idea is to get people to first associate Wackyland and Gogo Dodo with the crazy, bizarre and absurd. Ten years later, incorporate a load of eyes into the mix, so people associate eyes with the crazy, bizarre and absurd. Finally, years later, update Wackyland to include the eye in the pyramid... you get the point.

Anyway, the reason why these Porky Pig/Gogo Dodo cartoons resonated with me was because I used to watch Tiny Toon Adventures when I was about 11 years old, and I always liked the character of Gogo Dodo. The title song says "And Gogo is insane!" just as he hits himself over the head with a mallet in the title sequence... but as Gogo Dodo moves around his landscape, you can see the first few frames disappear into the right hand side... there's an eye in a pyramid disappearing off the side... blink and you'll miss it but it's there.... subliminal programming built up over longer than most of us have lived... what's stopping them distorting the natural order of things through some media or other for millenia?


Anyway, this video is a side-by-side comparison of Dough for the Do-Do and Porky in Wackyland:


Here's some screenshots that I took. First of all, the title card incorporates an eye, so the symbolism is there right from the start (you tend to get the shot of one eye in the first scene in a lot of films, too... to just name a few off the top of my head: A Better Tomorrow, Goodfellas, Nobody (2021) - usually violent/horror films):




The fact that the first thing Gogo Dodo does is sink his boat firmly plants the idea that Gogo Dodo = crazy:


Part of a background that loops when Gogo Dodo is running away from Porky Pig:



So, as we've seen, we've got the idea that "Wackyland and Gogo Dodo = crazy" embedded into people's minds from 1938 onwards, then it adds eyes 11 years later, so the connection is there so people think "people talking about one eye = crazy, because one eye = crazy". As shown above, the eye in the pyramid was added into the Wackyland mix in Tiny Toon Adventures (1990). Here's some stills from a short called Babs Goes to Wackyland:

She hides one eye before the big reveal of Gogo Dodo:


And there's an eye in the pyramid in the background now:



And there's another Tiny Toons Adventure episode called Her Wacky Highness, in which Babs ventures to Wackyland again. There's other noteworthy stuff in this but I'll concentrate on Wackyland. Here are some stills...

A man entices you to Wackyland, note the eyes in the background, albeit pairs...


The announcer is revealed to actually be Gogo Dodo:


As Babs descends into Wackyland, there's an eye in the pyramid in the first shot:


And also when a gigantic mouth is screaming at her. To associate people talking about the truth with pure insanity, maybe? Yeah, I'd say so:


Here is a link to analysis of Metropolis (1927), the above research is my own but here are the major themes which are still pushed these days, in their more embryonic stages cinema-wise, even before these cartoons!

Runway layout at Heathrow Airport

Just a very brief one on the runway layouts of Heathrow Airport, as I just wrote all this, published it, and the whole lot got deleted.

After WW2, the Zionist Jews who run everything decided to put their mark on the UK, a country that was now firmly it's bitch. This is an edited version of the history of Heathrow up until that point, courtesy of Wikipedia:

Heathrow Airport originated in 1929 as a small airfield (Great West Aerodrome) on land south-east of the hamlet of Heathrow from which the airport takes its name... Development of the whole Heathrow area as a much larger airport began in 1944... The airport was opened on 25 March 1946 as London Airport and was renamed Heathrow Airport in 1966.

 Something notable about Heathrow Airport after the war was it's layout. Here's an aerial view from the 1950's:


 

It resembles a hexagram, a six pointed star. More to the point, the two lines that converge near the top, despite missing the final parts, converge to where an eye appears to be... a similar design to the six pointed star that can be extrapolated from the pyramid on the dollar bill, and how it spells "mason": 

 


This is quite interesting since the hexagram is the symbol that perfectly encodes the number 666 in order to hide it in plain sight - six points, six lines, six angles.

This is a satellite view of how Heathrow Airport looks like today. I've drawn a few lines in MSPaint to show what lies in the apex now...


 I'll zoom in on the area right at the top of the pyramid, where the eye was on the original picture:

 As well as a road/track layout that suggests an inverted pentagram, there's a concorde that lies within the "eye". Triumph of man over God, perhaps?

Bonus pic showing the pentagram:




Decent resources

Just thought I'd share some resources that I feel are worth reading that can help bring one up to speed about the problems we are facing in the world today. These lists will be added to in due course. Where applicable I will present multiple formats for your convenience.

Decent web sites

Vigilant Citizen: Site that mainly focuses on satanic imagery in all forms of media. Due to its nature, a lot of it's content focuses on mind control and the MKUltra program. They do have other series of articles, notably "Sinister Sites". I remember reading on a sceptics forum once somebody posted that they'd been through this website and couldn't debunk anything on it and wanted help. They couldn't debunk it because you cannot debunk it. When this website first came out I remember reading its analysis of music videos and what it called "mind control symbolism"... so, some butterflies are flying around, so what? But I persevered (and eventually got to know more about the Monarch mind control program) and, after seeing the same tired old symbolism being used over and over and over again, it is obvious what the situation is. [edit 17/07/22: VC has now decided that you can only view a finite amount of articles before having to subscribe, so I'd recommend using a VPN. Of course, you could pay to support VC, but when they announced this new system that was sticking it to the advertisers, they reinstated their years old Pizzagate article. I noticed that this article had one comment on it dated four months ago, and they refused to publish my comment querying how this was possible... so they are just as bad re: censorship as the system they claim to rail against... Further, one of the articles discusses the eye in the pyramid/eye of providence and doesn't state the obvious truth that it's the "all seeing eye" of Lucifer the so-called "light bringer", so probably controlled opposition, especially considering how the forums are over run with shills... nevertheless, very informative]

Miri AF: Fantastic blog. I linked to one of her posts further down but got to put here whole blog up in this section as she's so consistently right about everything across the board, talking about what exactly is going on in the world (with a focus on the UK, where we both live).

Henry Makow: Not the most PC and I can't upload any of the articles from this site to Facebook as it's been blocked for "hate speech", most likely because, aside from offending every snowflake out there, Henry spends a lot of time exposing the Zionist, satanic Jews and so, although he is Jewish himself, falls victim to being labelled an "anti-semite" (yawn). There's a lot of decent factual stuff on this site, especially pertaining to WW2.

DC Pizzagate: The Pizzagate conspiracy, apparently "debunked" now but any debunking I've seen is either incomplete (completely missing the most obvious, damning, and in-your-face stuff - the Insta posts here are rather disturbing), focusses on nonsense that isn't relevant, or outright lies about the situation. Understand that the purpose of any debunking is to prevent you from looking yourself. In this fantastic and long article, eventually the author debunks the debunkers anyway. The only thing I would have an issue with is the fact that this scenario makes it seem like the democrats are the satanic paedos and the republicans are the good guys, but a book like Trance: Formation of America proves how incorrect such an assumption is, as they are both just as bad and working with each other in secret... the same team split in half to give the illusion of democracy instead of dictatorship, and to divide and rule.

Pseudoccult Media: A now-defunct blog that also talks about celebrities that are most likely abused/mind controlled, and how they are used to push certain agendas.

Paul Really Is Dead: This site only had four parts when I first encountered it, now it has six. I originally heard of the people behind this in an article in Wired years ago. I just found this fantastic page that shows the original article in an Italian copy of Wired, with translation, worth reading for some background. "Paul Really is Dead" manages to conclusively prove that the rumours that Paul is Dead are true, and fits into the idea that for any band to be a huge success, there must be a blood sacrifice (I'll write more on this later).

Even though I had a friend who was into the Beatles clue me in to the Paul is Dead thing five years before I'd ever got into any sort of thinking about how things may not always be what they seem, it was never really something I entertained or knew much about. I was intrigued by the cover of A Hard Day's Night (1964) recently, though:

If you look at the central column, it starts with John Lennon putting his hands around his eyes, therefore making a one-eye sign. George Harrison has his back turned, as if it symbolises somebody is about to be rubbed out, or is oblivious as to what is to come. Paul McCartney looks dozy, and is flanked by other McCartney's that are sneakily looking at him, as if he is the focus of attention. Note also the first Paul is a one eye picture. Underneath, Ringo Starr winks, another one eye. The column and the two dodgy Pauls looking at the middle Paul actually make the shape of an inverted cross. (There is other satanic symbolism in other Beatles covers, will write about it if I ever get round to it, but it's been covered elsewhere on the internet)

On the subject, I may as well throw this one in, a little more overt and as far as I'm aware, I've never known anybody point this out before. Check out the cover of AC/DC's Highway to Hell (1979):


It's pretty obvious to me what's going on here. On the left, the majority of the band members are looking like mean mofos. This is serious business. In the foreground, lead guitarist Angus Young is basically the devil. But who's this to the side, who seems detached from the others? Not only that but he's actually smiling, like this whole rock star thing's all a bit of a laugh? Why, that's Bon Scott. He died from alcohol poisoning, so we are told, six months later, before they hit superstardom with a new singer on the album "Back in Black"...

David Icke and the Deception: Brilliant website that proves without a shadow of a doubt that David Icke is a shill. This was taken down from the internet years ago. David Icke claims that a lot of his money goes on fighting court cases, what he doesn't say is those cases probably involve silencing people like the author of this site. Thankfully, due to the internet archive, the site lives on. Not all pictures there but all the text and there's a lot of various subjects discussed here. The Internet Archive has a number of snapshots of this web site. This link is the first one from 2015. The last backup at Oct 2016 has some pages missing (first page is there but for others it says the domain has expired) but this seems complete to me so far. Also, the author rips into Henry Makow too, and makes some good points. More controlled opposition?

Know Your Enemy: Mark Fairley from The Fuel Project's incredible documentary, available in 77 bite sized chunks. Does a good job of explaining what is actually going on in the world from a Christian perspective. 

Decent Articles

War is a Racket: Wikipedia says it best: "War Is a Racket is a speech and a 1935 short book, by Smedley D. Butler, a retired United States Marine Corps Major General and two-time Medal of Honor recipient. Based on his career military experience, Butler discusses how business interests commercially benefit, such as war profiteering from warfare." Well worth the short time it takes to read it.

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars: This manual for control (and "elite" manuals for control go back as far as the days of mystery school initiate Plato's "The Republic" - see especially the "noble" lie...) was supposedly found on July 7, 1986, in an IBM copier that had been purchased at a surplus sale. I'd hazard that it's just the powers that shouldn't be hiding their agenda in plain sight. Nevertheless I have no reason to doubt the authenticity of this document and find it to make fascinating reading. Very dry in places but some of the stuff is sheer dynamite and very much eye-opening.

Satanic Occult Symbols In Washington D.C.: Fantastic factual article full of concrete evidence that can not be disputed. Although I do remember reading some "debunking" once and the best they could come up with was really pedantic, nit-picking stuff like "the inverted pentagram [which actually appears directly over the White House, the four lines at the bottom converging on it] is missing a couple of sections so it's not a true inverted pentagram", implying that the theories are reaching. Of course, a debunking primarily exists to make sure somebody does not go to the source of the material, the job is to smear and close down minds. Perfectly illustrated in this picture from this article:

Yes, two of the parts are missing (in yellow) but it's obvious what they are getting at (this is also obvious in the post-WW2 layout of the runways at Heathrow Airport - also, on the subject of ridiculous "debunkings", one of my "favourites" is this horrible hatchet job from the website "J7: The July 7th Truth Campaign" which supposedly debunks the fantastic "7/7 Ripple Effect" video by starting with an ad hominem attack and then following with the flimsiest, laziest dismissal... might write about that too sometime).

The entire Jesus is Savior site (and its sister site, Jesus is Precious) contains loads of brilliant reportage and I'd recommend despite one's spiritual beliefs, its core message is solid.

The Satanic Roots of Rock: Brilliant article, a lot of the info ties in with a lot of other things.

Illuminati Sex Slaves Paint Horrifying Picture: Article on the Henry Makow site that's a good little primer to two of the books below.

The Bread-Beer-Circus Parade: Interesting article on the Rogue Male blog, where he talks about techniques to control the masses, focussing on organised sport for men. Now I'm not really fussed about watching people play sport but I don't share this in order to look down on those who do - indeed, we're all controlled and manipulated to some degree and I won't say that I'm not - nevertheless, I find the article enlightening.

Modern Life Isn't Real - It's Created by the Media: Great article on the Miri AF blog that talks of how mainstream "news" and media is just propaganda.

Decent Books

A History of Central Banking and The Enslavement of Mankind: They say that history is written by the victor but Stephen Goodson's fantastic factual book actually tells the truth! It explains how the bankers have manipulated money to enslave and control for years. Check out this quote relating to UK life:

"With tolerable taxes, no state debt and no interest to pay, England enjoyed a period of unparalleled growth and prosperity. The average labourer worked only 14 weeks and enjoyed 160 to 180 holidays. According to Lord William Leverhulme, a writer of that time, “The men of the 15th century were very well paid”, in fact so well paid that the purchasing power of their wages and their standard of living would only be exceeded in the late 19th century. A labourer could provide for all the necessities his family required. They were well clothed in good woollen cloth and had plenty of meat and bread."

Imagine that many holidays! We're always duped into believing we've never had it so good, but it's obvious a better way is possible. Open your mind and prepare to have it blown. It's no surprise that the 15th century was the end of the period they call the "middle ages", implying nothing interesting happened during that time, since Western history is all about applauding the victories and conquests of the satanists, without telling us why (for example: wars in Afghanistan and Vietnam in order to gain control of the heroin trade, pretty much the majority of wars so the Rothschilds can get a central bankand a puppet government installed). The easy lie is the usual one, bringing civilisation and democracy to the "savages".

Trance: Formation of America: Original book, scanned. The autobiography of Cathy O'Brien, a woman born into an intergenerational ritual satanic abuse family, sold by her parents to the government for use as a sex slave/spy. Heavy going but very much eye opening. This book gives the lie to the fact that it's only Democrats who are the satanic paedophiles and the Republicans are the clean cut All American types. This book shows they are working together behind the scenes. Here's a non-exhaustive list of the politicians who were either her handlers or who she was used as a sex slave by:

Republican: Guy Vander Jagt, Gerald Ford, Dick Cheney, Dick Thornberg

Democrat: Robert Byrd, J. Bennett Johnston, Gary Ackerman, Jim Traficant, Bill Clinton (whilst the governor of Arkansas - no sex but drug running, though she did have sex with Hillary)

Both: Arlen Spector

Also, Lt. Colonel Michael Aquino was involved in her abuse. Now, a critique of this book is that those involved could not possibly have the time to do all the things they do in this book and hold down their day jobs. Well, whilst serving in the military, Michael Aquino was also able to complete a Ph.D. and founded the satanic organisation, the Temple of Set (which he created after leaving the Church of Satan, as he thought it was full of posers. Summoned the devil who said his real name was Set - and there you have it). Here's his CV/resume, which used to be on the ToS site, xeper.org. Anyway, I think this man's CV is proof these guys seem to be able to get on with quite a lot, and get away with too, if you notice that in his Bibliography there's a book called Extreme Prejudice, where he talks of the satanic abuse allegations against him, which he obviously managed to beat, and then he wrote a book playing the victim! Incidentally, if one searches for "michael aquino satanic abuse scandal" in Google, the first results are links to the Amazon listing for his book, whereas DuckDuckGo's first results are links to blog posts that expose him. And whilst we're on the subject, Wikipedia's page on satanic ritual abuse is basically a piece that dismisses it and shows how the media and the system managed to do their best to cover it up. HBO even came out with a TV movie that portrayed those accused as innocent victims, for crying out loud. Way to influence public opinion! The TV movie was about somebody other than Michael Aquino (seems those satanists were busy!). The article actually states "The film is cited as a watershed in the shift of ideas about satanic ritual abuse, recasting Ray Buckey as a victim of a hysterical conspiracy rather than a child abuser", which shows how the propaganda did the job it intended to, once again, moulding the malleable human mind to think as it is told.

Thanks for the Memories: PDF of mind controlled slave Brice Taylor's sensational autobiography. As with Cathy O'Brien, she has two main handlers. In this book however, they are Henry Kissinger and Bob Hope! The entire thing falls into the "so bizarre it must be true" category and the fact that these two books exist without anybody trying to sue them sure says a lot. Goes into more depth on the issues regarding the ins and out of programming. Towards the end it seems to get more vague and I wondered whether she really managed to break free from her captors - at one point she's on the run with Cathy O'Brien and the businessman who supposedly rescued her, Mark Phillips, but in the book, Brice Taylor straight up says he is a retired CIA man. I'd guess that both women are still manipulated somehow and maybe these books exist as another hiding in plain sight/cannot say we weren't warned type exercise, spreading their own disinformation in some ways mixed in with the truth. They can be demoralising and depressing reads also (another reason to make this information public). Nevertheless, essential reading for those with the stomach for the truth. 

Meditations: Stoic Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius's classic musings, fantastically translated. Just a book that's well worth reading. It really starts at chapter 2, page 91.

God vs. Darwin: The Logical Supremacy of Intelligent Design: Creationism Over Evolution: The whole reason this blog exists is because I used to be a staunch atheist, sometimes agnostic. Raised as a Roman Catholic due to having an Irish mother but I never believed in any of it, in fact was rather blasphemous. Anyway, a religious experience in 2015 at the age of 35, an experience I had whilst a practising Buddhist, led me to understand that God actually exists (and so did Moses and Jesus, as I later came to know to be true). All this came to be made clear to me during a set of circumstances that enabled me to raise my vibration so high that... well, at the time, trying to come to terms with it on the first day, it felt like I could see through the matrix, but I've come to not like that term, because I think it triggers a lot of preconceived notions in people's minds. A better term would be to say I vibrated at the God frequency, the frequency we all vibrated on before the allegorical Fall of Man. I'd read a little on evolution but had to admit that it all seemed a little far-fetched to me. I remember reading a possible theory for how an eye could form and the best they had was there was a worm who had a patch of skin that let in more light. Somehow this was preferable to not having this patch, they thrived (but worms obviously still exist), eventually this patch evolved into an eye! Honestly it sounded hilarious, and this comes from a guy who always praised evolution and bashed "Intelligent Design". Anyway, having realised that if God is real, evolution must be a load of nonsense, I wanted a book that would fight God's corner and MS King's book definitely fits the bill. He is a little too smug but to be fair, he does have good reason to be. A lot of evidence and logic given here. One of my favourite things is how when he quotes from Darwin's first edition of "On the Origin of Species", a lot of the time Darwin spins some theory and then says "there is no actual evidence for my theory, but I dare say we'll find some in the future". So much for scientific method and conclusions derived from the study of empirical data! I would also hazard a guess that the first edition of said book was maybe a guide for Darwin's cronies to set about falsifying evidence? Just a thought that's came to me, I'd have to read it again to be sure though. Anyway, the man just crushes it in this book. Essential reading.

On a similar note, here's a quote from Nobel Prize winner George Wald, in which he doesn't seem very scientific, either:

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/85/df/e8/85dfe83e0c1a415175b7efe61977f67d.jpg 

And whilst we're on the subject of "scientists" I remember talking about such matters with a friend who's got a biology degree. He's the kind of person who is conditioned to just laugh when I mention that the Illuminati have an official web site, and claims "there is no conspiracy, just... billionaires". He claimed that he's managed to prove evolution during his biology degree because he knocked out 100 fruitflies with ethanol and managed to get their offspring to build up a tolerance to it - hence, evolution. Of course, by this logic, a baby born with a crack addiction has evolved, but he isn't able to see that.

The British Mad Dog: Another book by MS King, this time one that totally exposes Zionist shill and traitor to his country, Winston Churchill.

War is a Racket: PDF (book scan) version of the document mentioned above

War is a Racket: PDF (web page copy) version of the document mentioned above

Silent weapons for Quiet Wars: PDF version of the document mentioned above

Trance: Formation of America: PDF, OCR version, neater version of the document mentioned above

Thanks for the Memories: Large Print PDF of the document mentioned above

Thanks for the Memories: EPUB version of the document mentioned above

Thanks for the Memories: Kindle version of the document mentioned above