This is a slightly edited version of something I wrote on Facebook in 2019 shortly after Greta Thunberg first appeared. It was a response to people who claimed there was no agenda she was pushing other than being concerned with climate change. So, I took the time to give a quick response and was met with... nothing. Business as usual!
The question: Why is Greta Thunberg pushing an agenda?
The first assumption that we need to make is that the people who run the world (generally known as an occult "elite") are working against our best interests. Proving or disproving this is outside the scope of this discussion, especially considering how hard it is on both sides to get the other to see the other's viewpoint. So, to anybody who refuses to accept this assumption, this completely discredits and invalidates pretty much anything that I say from here on in. From my point of view, I would say that people tend to believe whoever got there first. After that, people can tend to be inflexible. I try to illustrate why that is in my Shaping Thought articles, but reality is that the people who really need to be reading such articles would dismiss them as crazy before even clicking a link to this blog, let alone getting this far.
The second assumption that one needs to make is that there is a depopulation agenda. To be brief, here are links to support this fact:
First of all, the first "commandment" of the Georgia Guidestones is that the Earth's population must be maintained at 500 million. Here is a link to the Wikipedia article on it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones
This website comes at it from more of a conspiracy theory angle: https://vigilantcitizen.com/sinistersites/sinister-sites-the-georgia-guidestones/
This is a video that shows Bill Gates lecturing at a TED talk in 2010 about using vaccines to reduce the amount of CO2 produced by humans.
(Update 25/6/2022: was a YT link but, as the lamestream media burns the books in earnest, I've noticed now the account was deleted. I'm thankful Bitchute has another copy. It used to be embedded but now you've got to click on the link)
A friend of mine recently showed me Snopes' refutation to this: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-gates-vaccinations-depopulation/
To me personally, this has always been the page that proved that Snopes isn't about exposing the truth, but pushing an agenda... because if you watch the clip, the whole vibe is Bill Gates saying "there is too much CO2, therefore reduce the population". The rest of the Snopes article, to me, is damage limitation and backtracking - the site's job is done if it can encourage the reader to not actually watch the video, where the true intention of Bill Gates is so obviously clear.
A quick Google search will yield a number of articles about vaccines in Africa containing drugs that make women sterile. Some will support the argument, some will claim to refute it. If such a thing is a falsehood, why does such a claim exist in the first place? Here's a link to an article claiming the tetanus vaccine make 500,000 Kenyan women women sterile: https://allafrica.com/stories/201502150078.html
As far back as 1995, vaccine manufacturers have been accused of such: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12346214/
I also remember reading years ago that at the Copenhagen Summit, they were actually talking about reducing the population. This would've been about 10 years ago now, even if I could find a bookmarked article it's probably long since deleted.
So, how does this tie in to Greta Thunberg? Okay, taking all the above factors into account, a third assumption can be made: the people running the world are acting against our best interests; there is a depopulation agenda, and the climate change issue is covertly being used to promote this agenda.
I shall end with a couple of links to the website Vigilant Citizen, which I would recommend as a pretty solid resource for this sort of thing, which focuses on facts that can be verified, rather than abstract metaphysical concepts that can't be proved or disproved. I must admit that at first all the references to symbolism appears to be reaching, but once you see it again and again and again, a very solid case is presented.
This is a link to a man promoting an obsession of the occult "elite", cannibalism, and touting it as a solution to climate change!: https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/scientist-proposes-cannibalism-to-save-the-climate-on-swedish-tv/
If they could promote paedophilia/incest as a solution to climate change, they'd do it. I guess this will do for them for now... (honestly... it probably will get to "have sex with your immediate family to reduce the population" - you heard it here first)
Anyway, Greta Thunberg... well, the one eye sign is usually used as a symbol of submission to the occult "elite", so here's two pics of Greta doing it, from May 2019:
 |
| On the cover of I-D |
 | |
| And another one eye in the photoshoot inside. |
And she's still at it in 2021, on the cover of a magazine that comes with middle-brow propaganda rag, The Guardian:
Greta in Vigilant Citizen's "The Elite Machine Behind Greta Thunberg": https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/the-elite-machine-behind-greta-thunberg/
At first you may think nothing of it, but if you explore Vigilant Citizen further, the picture becomes a lot clearer (there are other good resources for this sort of thing, too). I wouldn't expect the "reduce the population" agenda to be made mainsteam for at least a few years yet, though... these things take a lot of time, this is the culmination of a plan that has taken thousands of years.
The Overton Window is a technique used to make the previously unthinkable, thinkable. The example given in this article shows the normalisation of cannibalism, and this has been going on for years. For example, there was what people assumed was some sort of LARP in 2020 (https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message4235821/pg1), a website called peoplearemeat.com appeared, claiming to be a cannibal restaurant. Here's a Wayback Machine link: https://web.archive.org/web/20200111204848/https://peoplearemeat.com/
Don't be surprised as this slowly enters the public arena, outside of the true news that people are conditioned to dismiss as fake news, when the real fake news is the mainstream news. Here's a link to an explanation of the Overton Window: https://www.otilo.net/2021/05/the-overton-window-theory-technology-of.html
Edit 24/7/2022: The New York Times recently published as article about cannibalism, here's the tweet about it: https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1550864590560546816
